Smart Manufacturing / Quality Assurance

Inline Weld Seam Inspection Cell

Every Weld Graded in 38 ms, On the Line, Without a Network

Inline Weld Seam Inspection Cell
Smart Manufacturing
Industry
9 months
Duration
4 → 9
TRL
4
Disciplines

Background

A tier-two automotive fabricator inspected robotic MIG welds by sampling — an operator pulled roughly one part in forty to a light booth. Defects that escaped sampling surfaced at the customer, and each containment event cost more than a week of production margin.

The problem

What made it hard.

Inspection had to finish inside the robot cell's 45 ms index window or it would slow the line, which ruled out sending frames to a server. Weld appearance shifted constantly with spatter, tip wear and shielding gas flow, so a fixed-threshold vision recipe drifted within a shift. The plant also refused any inspection system that required opening the OT network.

Approach

What we built.

We built a self-contained cell: two GigE cameras on a rigid frame with controlled ring lighting, feeding a Jetson Orin NX running a segmentation model quantised to INT8 through TensorRT. The model outputs a seam mask and a per-millimetre defect class — porosity, undercut, burn-through, insufficient fill. Inference lands at 38 ms end to end, inside the index window, with the verdict pushed to the cell PLC over OPC UA as a simple pass/divert bit. Nothing leaves the cell. A local ring buffer keeps the last 5,000 part images so quality engineers can retrain against real escapes; retraining runs offline and ships back as a signed model bundle on removable media.

Outcome

What it measured.

38 ms
inference latency, inside the 45 ms index window
100%
of welds inspected, up from 2.5% sampling
21 ppm
escaped defects, down from 340 ppm

The cell moved the fabricator from 2.5% sampling to 100% inspection with no cycle-time penalty. Escaped-defect rate to the customer fell from 340 ppm to 21 ppm over the first two quarters, and the plant retired two of three light-booth stations. Because the verdict is a PLC bit rather than a network call, the system passed the customer's OT security audit without an exception.

Our role

Optical design; cell mechanics; model development and quantisation; PLC integration; commissioning and operator training.

Technologies

NVIDIA Jetson Orin NXTensorRTGigE VisionPyTorchOPC UAC++Profinet

Gallery

Inside the build.

Screen capture of the segmentation overlay: weld seam masked in cyan with a porosity cluster boxed in amber, per-millimetre class strip along the bottom.

Figure 1 — Screen capture of the segmentation overlay.

The Jetson enclosure DIN-railed inside the cell control cabinet, wired to camera PoE and the PLC terminal block.

Figure 2 — The Jetson enclosure DIN-railed inside the cell control cabinet, wired to camera PoE and the PLC terminal block..

Latency budget diagram: trigger → capture → inference → OPC UA verdict, annotated against the 45 ms index window.

Figure 3 — Latency budget diagram.

Operator HMI showing shift-level defect Pareto by class.

Figure 4 — Operator HMI showing shift-level defect Pareto by class..

Next case study

Cold-Chain Integrity Recorder Logistics

Battery-Powered Excursion Detection That Survives 14 Days Off-Grid

Cold-Chain Integrity Recorder

16 days
battery life on a single primary cell
87%
reduction in false excursion alerts

Tell us what you’re building.

Send the constraint that worries you most — a latency budget, a power budget, a certification date. We’ll tell you straight whether we’re the right team.