Smart Cities / Shared Infrastructure

Urban Infrastructure IoT Network

Shared Multi-Application Network With Tenant Governance

Urban Infrastructure IoT Network
Smart Cities
Industry
8 months
Duration
3 → 8
TRL
8
Disciplines

Background

City-scale IoT programs are often stood up per-use-case, fragmenting connectivity and data. The client wanted a shared network and platform usable across lighting, parking, waste, and environmental applications.

The problem

What made it hard.

Balancing shared-platform economics with per-application needs, and governing data access across departments and vendors.

Approach

What we built.

We designed a shared network with dedicated tenants per application, a common platform for device and user management, and application-level APIs on top. Data governance is explicit - tenants see only what policy allows, with audit trails across interactions.

Workstreams

What the program actually covered.

This was delivered as 2 coordinated workstreams over 8 months.

WS 01

Smart Street Lighting Control System

We deployed luminaire-level controllers on a mesh network with gateway backhaul to a central management system. Dimming schedules, fault detection, and energy reporting run through a single interface.

Networking · Controls

WS 02

Waste Collection Optimization System

We deployed ruggedized fill-level sensors on containers, feeding into a routing engine that produces daily plans respecting driver shifts, vehicle capacity, and priority zones. A driver mobile app provides turn-by-turn execution and completion tracking.

IoT Sensors · Routing Algorithms

Outcome

What it measured.

Shared
network across applications
Multi-tenant
platform with policy controls
Faster
per-application rollouts

The client can now roll out new IoT applications in weeks rather than quarters, reusing the existing network and platform. Departmental adoption grew as the platform demonstrated reliability across pilot applications.

Our role

Network architecture; platform; governance design.

Technologies

LoRaWANcellularshared platformMesh networkingluminaire controllersCMSFill-level sensorsroute optimizationmobile apps

Gallery

Inside the build.

Sector and whip antennas mounted on a rooftop mast with feeder cables and mounting brackets against a grey sky.

Figure 1 - Shared LoRaWAN gateways on municipal rooftops carry traffic for every application on the network, with cellular used where gateway coverage is uneconomic. Photograph is illustrative of typical gateway siting.

Municipal waste and recycling bins standing at a kerb on a city street.

Figure 2 - Ultrasonic fill-level sensors fitted inside communal bins report over the same shared network; collection rounds are then planned from measured fill rather than a fixed calendar. Photograph is illustrative of the asset class instrumented.

Operators seated at a control-room desk facing a wall of monitoring screens in a dimly lit room.

Figure 3 - Lighting, waste and environmental departments share one platform but not one data set; tenant policy controls scope what each operator and vendor can see. Photograph is illustrative of the municipal operations setting.

Next case study

Inline Weld Seam Inspection Cell Smart Manufacturing

Every Weld Graded in 38 ms, On the Line, Without a Network

Inline Weld Seam Inspection Cell

38 ms
inference latency, inside the 45 ms index window
100%
of welds inspected, up from 2.5% sampling

Tell us what you’re building.

Send the constraint that worries you most - a latency budget, a power budget, a certification date. We’ll tell you straight whether we’re the right team.