Fleet Management IoT Platform
Multi-tenant vehicle telemetry backend with real-time and historical dashboards.
Capability
Ingest, time-series storage and APIs sized for device fleets, with the offline-first behaviour edge deployments actually need. Backends built by engineers who also wrote the firmware on the other end of the connection - so the API is designed for the reality of the device, not the wish list of a spec.
Scope
Cloud software for hardware-connected products is a different discipline from consumer web software - the traffic patterns are different, the tolerance for missed data is different, and the operational reality is different. We build cloud backends specifically for the case where devices are the primary users and dashboards are the secondary.
Outcomes
A backend for a device fleet is judged by how it behaves at 10x the current device count. What our cloud programs consistently deliver:
Message queues sized for burst reconnects (after a regional outage, every device reconnects at once). Storage indexed for the queries dashboards actually run, not the ones a benchmark suite runs.
Bounded latency, versioned contracts, and graceful degradation when a downstream service is offline. Devices assume the network is bad because the field proves them right.
Interfaces designed for the operations team - alarm hierarchies, historic views, exports. Not admin dashboards designed for the engineer who built them.
Everything in code (Terraform / CDK). Documented runbooks. Nothing built in a console that only works if we did it.
Process
Four phases with a real deliverable at each gate - you always know what you paid for and what ships next.
PHASE 01
We start from the constraint that binds - power, latency, thermal, certification - and design backwards from it. You leave with a written architecture, a budget range and the risks named, whether or not we build it.
PHASE 02
Schematics, mechanical and firmware architecture proceed in parallel. High-risk blocks get simulated or breadboarded before the full layout commits.
PHASE 03
Iterative revisions against real bench and field testing. You see every revision, not just the last one. Integration is continuous, not a phase.
PHASE 04
Pilot in the field, closure with the contract manufacturer, production test procedures, and a commissioning-grade handover pack.
Technologies
The platforms we reach for most. If a project needs something not on this list, we say so - the tool is chosen for the constraint, never to fit our habits.
Industries
Plant-floor telemetry, historian integration, operator dashboards.
Farm-scale sensor telemetry with intermittent cellular tolerance.
Multi-tenant public-realm data platforms.
B2B SaaS with operational workflows (asset registers, service portals).
Deliverables & IP
Every cloud program hands over: infrastructure as code (Terraform or CDK) that provisions the whole stack from an empty account, application source with CI/CD pipelines, database schemas and migration tooling, dashboards as configuration (Grafana JSON, PowerBI packs), API documentation, runbook for common failure modes, and an escalation guide with paging integration if requested. All foreground IP transfers on payment.
Case studies
Every entry links to the full case study - constraints, what we built, and what it measured afterwards.
Multi-tenant vehicle telemetry backend with real-time and historical dashboards.
Web + mobile operations platform for technicians and dispatch.
Auditable asset register with compliance workflows for a regulated utility.
Compliance
Cloud backends storing Australian personal or sensitive data trigger the Australian Privacy Principles by default; we design with encryption at rest and in transit, role-based access control, and audit logging as the baseline. For sectors with specific residency requirements (health, financial services, some government), we deploy in AU regions and document the data flows explicitly.
Multi-tenant systems get tenant isolation designed at the data layer, not as an application-level convention. We do not build platforms where a bug in the tenancy filter leaks cross-tenant data - the database schema and IAM policies enforce isolation.
FAQ
Why Incendio
Cloud backends for hardware fleets built by pure web teams tend to make optimistic assumptions about network quality and burst patterns - because they have never watched a device reconnect after a cellular outage. We write the firmware on the other end of the connection, so our APIs are designed for the field, not the workstation.
Related practices: IoT development, embedded systems, industrial automation, edge AI.
Start
A latency budget, a power budget, a certification date. We reply within one business day - and we’ll say so if we’re not the right team.